Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Chapman. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn Chapman. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
A 27-year-old mother has opened up about her anguish after giving birth to her baby son at 36 weeks knowing he was going to be stillborn. 
Brooke Campbell, from Brisbane, nearly died after she lost more than 1.7 litres of blood when she suffered a severe haemorrhage in the early hours of August 28.
But after she was taken to hospital, the young woman completely broke down when her obstetrician found baby Darcy no longer had a heartbeat.
'I looked at the ultrasound screen and could see Darcy's lifeless body just hanging there inside me,' Ms Campbell told Daily Mail Australia.
'There are no words but gut-wrenching and a vivid picture in my mind that I will never forget.
'It was too late to do anything as he was already gone.'
The cause of her unborn son's death was a haemorrhage caused by a placental abruption - which occurs when the placenta separates from the uterus. 
'The placenta just blew off from the uterus wall, causing Darcy to go into cardiac arrest. And he passed away due to no oxygen,' she said.
'I was in complete shock and I just didn't believe it. But I knew while we were waiting for the ambulance at home with the amount of blood and clots I was losing and that I couldn't feel him... something was very very wrong.'
Her husband Elliott, 34, was bringing their bags in from the ambulance when she told him about the tragic news.
'I still remember the look on Elliot's face when he walked into the room and I said: "Darcy is gone, he doesn't have a heartbeat",' she recalled.
'He just said "No you're wrong, how does this happen". He just dropped to the floor hysterically crying. He took it really badly. Three nurses helped him back to his feet.'
The distraught mother was transferred to a birth suite where she had to deliver her baby knowing he was going to be stillborn.
'There are no words to describe the pain and heart break knowing he was going to be stillborn. Horrific and gut-wrenching won't even cover it,' Ms Campbell said.
'We chose not to do an unnecessary caesarean section. We continued on with a vaginal birth as my first was also vaginal.
'It was such a cruel thing I had to go through with the labour and delivery. Knowing Darcy would be gone when he came out it killed me so much but it had to be done.
'I just burst into tears knowing what would be coming next. Three big pushes and he was out... 53 centimetres long and 3.3 kilograms just like his big brother.
'Darcy looked healthy and beautiful except he didn't cry like a newborn. He just looked like he was asleep which shattered my heart into many pieces because I just wanted him to gasp and take his first breath.'
The infant was stillborn, leaving his parents and his two-year-old brother with a few moments to build memories of him in candid photographs.
'The hospital offered us as much time with Darcy as we wanted so we spent the whole of Monday and Tuesday with him,' Ms Campbell said.
'He even got to stay in our room with a bassinet which had a cooling system that was also provided but I'd refused to let him go.
'I cuddled him on my chest all night with my arms wrapped around him. I woke up many times that night just to cuddle, kiss and silently cry, trying not to wake Elliot up.
Cradling the tiny boy in her arms for the final time, Ms Campbell was comforted by her husband as little Noah planted a tender kiss on his stillborn sibling.
'He was wrapped and placed on my chest, it was a beautifully tragic time,' she said. 
'I had such a rollercoaster of crazy emotions because it just wasn't fair that he wasn't alive... he was so healthy. He looked perfect and just like Noah which made it harder.
'Noah was very gentle with him but was confused why the baby wasn't moving. He's still too young to understand but he kissed Darcy a lot when he met him in hospital.
'I was holding Darcy so tightly and sobbing. My heart felt like it was shattered beyond repair.'
Her blood test found Ms Campbell had a rare clotting, genetic disorder called Factor V Leiden, which affects one in 20-25 people.
'If this test was to become mandatory during pregnancy for all women, then I would not have lost my healthy beautiful son,' she said.
'The test informs you if you have Factor V Leiden - and then you can have injections throughout pregnancy to prevent suffering a placental abruption.'
'Women just need to have the option there to get tested for this disorder otherwise they may hold the gene and be risking the life of their unborn baby, themselves and future grandchildren.'
After finding the strength to tell her story, Ms Campbell said she wanted to raise awareness about the dangers and the possibility that people, including pregnant women and men, could be carrying the genetic disorder without knowing.
'The pain and suffering we endured through the past six weeks are just horrendous and no parent should ever have to ever bury their healthy child,' she said.
'I don't want people to risk their own lives or the lives of their unborn children so I just want to get the message across this disorder does exist.
'It's common and no one even really knows about it until its too late. We didn't even know what it was until we got the results back after Darcy had passed away.'
For other women who have suffered a stillbirth, Ms Campbell said: 'You don't have to be strong but get the support you need.
'Talk to friends and family about your loss. Keeping it bottled up inside will just make it worse,' she said.
'I didn't leave the house for a few weeks after because I was too much of an emotional wreck talking about what happened so I waited until I thought I could.
'I would be totally put off if Darcy was our first child but we are lucky to already have our son Noah to distract us and get us up each morning.
'I am keeping positive by telling myself: "I will have another baby or two in the future and I will get my rainbow baby".
'I know Darcy would want me to be happy - and for me to grieve is to get pregnant again sooner rather than later.'
The family's photographer Natasha Thaelser has vowed to double donations to little Darcy's legacy on the Bears of Hope campaign.
Oscar-winning movie producer Harvey Weinstein is at the centre of a sexual harassment scandal, which has led to him being sacked by his own company.

Actress Meryl Streep - who once called him "God" in an awards speech - has spoken out against him, saying the claims left her "appalled".
Many others have now denounced him for the alleged behaviour, including Kate Winslet, Emma Watson, Leonardo DiCaprio, Benedict Cumberbatch and Charlize Theron.
When the claims were first reported in the New York Times, Weinstein apologised for causing "a lot of pain". He later disputed the article, however, claiming the report was "saturated with false and defamatory statements".
An article in The New Yorker later said that Weinstein had raped three women, which he denies.
Others including Angelina Jolie and Gwyneth Paltrow have now also spoken out, with Jolie saying she had a "bad experience" with Weinstein as a young actress, and Paltrow saying he had placed his hands on her and suggested massages in his bedroom.
It's a dramatic fall from grace for one of the movie industry's highest-profile producers, which could have wider implications for Hollywood itself.
Here are five pressing questions that arise from this mounting scandal.
The man behind such hits as Pulp Fiction and Shakespeare in Love reportedly did not want to leave The Weinstein Company - but was fired anyway.
He was apologetic but bullish last week when the allegations were first published and threatened to sue the New York Times, the paper that broke the story.
Since then, he's been deserted by both his lawyer Lisa Bloom and his legal crisis adviser Lanny Davis.
And in his personal life, his wife Georgina Chapman has now left him.
It remains to be seen whether he will make good his threats of legal action.
Weinstein was made an honorary CBE by the Queen in 2004 for his contribution to the British film industry, and there have already been calls for that to be revoked. Prime Minister Theresa May has said she's "concerned" about the allegations, but any decision on his CBE would not lie with Downing Street.
Yet there is always the possibility he can bounce back, like other disgraced Hollywood figures who have returned to the limelight.
Mel Gibson, for example, was back on Hollywood's red carpets earlier this year, despite an anti-Semitic rant during a public meltdown 11 years ago - although the allegations against Weinstein put him in a different situation.
Weinstein's firing comes after a number of high-profile men have left their jobs amid claims of sexual misconduct.
These include Roger Ailes, Bill O'Reilly and Eric Bolling at Fox News and Ain't It Cool News founder Harry Knowles. Bill Cosby is also facing a retrial over sexual assault charges.
O'Reilly said they were "completely unfounded claims" and Bolling described the claims against him as "untrue and terribly unfair". Knowles called the initial allegation "100% untrue" and later decided to "step away" from his role.
"Men in Hollywood need to change ASAP," said actress Rose McGowan in an interview with the Hollywood Reporter.
"Hollywood's power is dying because society has changed and grown, and yet Hollywood male behaviour has not. It is so not a good look."
Jenni Konner, executive producer of the HBO series Girls, told the New York Times on Sunday: "I see this as a tipping point.
"This is the moment we look back on and say, 'That's when it all started to change.'"
Weinstein may have been fired but an internal investigation will still go ahead. The company said it had retained an independent law firm "to undertake a thorough and independent investigation".
This will be a financial burden on the company, with Forbes reporting such investigations can cost between $20m (£15m) and $40m (£30m) to carry out. Forbes also said the company would find it more expensive to raise funds in the future.
Weinstein and his brother Bob own 42% of the company, but it's unclear how profitable the company has been in recent years.
It had started to move into TV production, but without its most famous figurehead and driving force it is unclear what will happen to any deals it has signed.
One third of the company's all-male board resigned when the allegations emerged.
The Wrap has reported that the company is set to change its name in an attempt to move on after Weinstein's firing. The website claims the Weinstein name has been "irretrievably tainted by the scandal", although it says a decision has not been formally made.
Weinstein is renowned for his campaigning skills, often managing to turn smaller, independent films into Oscar contenders.
A 2015 survey of nearly 1,400 Oscar acceptance speeches by the website Vocativ found that Weinstein was thanked more frequently than God.
One of his biggest hits was Shakespeare in Love, which won the best picture Oscar in 1999. A sequel has since been announced, with Weinstein as producer.
The Weinstein Company also distributed such films as The King's Speech, The English Patient and Chicago, all of which - like The Artist - won the best picture Oscar.
This year the company is pushing Wind River, a wintry thriller starring Jeremy Renner and Mary Elizabeth Olsen.
The Current War, produced by Weinstein and starring Benedict Cumberbatch as Thomas Edison, is also a possible awards contender, despite receiving mixed reviews. Will the Weinstein connection dent their chances?

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) and several Democratic politicians have come out to say they will now channel Weinstein's political donations towards women's rights groups.
The producer was a prominent donor to the Democratic Party during the 2016 election campaign.
"The DNC will donate over $30,000 (£22,850) in contributions from Weinstein to Emily's List, Emerge America and Higher Heights," the committee said in a statement.
There are also question marks about his other donations and interests.